NeurIPS 2020

Agnostic Learning with Multiple Objectives

Meta Review

Four knowledgeable referees thoroughly evaluated the paper and author's response to their initial reviews. Three of them recommend acceptance, one reviewer leans towards marginal rejection. All things considered, I recommend accepting this paper as a poster. The reviewers insist that the more comprehensive comparisons relevant related work and a link to software code be included in the final revision. We strongly urge you to, and we trust that you will, make these changes.