This paper provides a model to explain and generate visual illusions of certain types. Strengths include the interesting and novel problem and approach, and the potential that this line of work will lead to contributions to both computer vision and human vision research. R1, R2, R3 offer positive reviews, while R4 is concerned that the paper overclaims how general the model is, suggesting the authors make clear they are focusing on one particular type of illusion. The rebuttal promises to address this. Given the mixed reviews, the AC read the paper and agrees with R1-R3's positive opinions. Nevertheless, please address the feedback, especially R4's suggestion to more clearly and precisely state the contributions.